|
Christine Lubinski started by noting the serious concerns
that members of the
Medicare and Medicaid
Working Group had with the
provisions regarding
dual-eligibles in the [now passed] Medicare reform
legislation, urging audience
members to join the group in visiting
legislators to address those concerns.
Ms. Lubinski continued by gearing her
comments to address “the fight to preserve
and enhance the
[Medicaid]
entitlement.”
“One of the things we’ve been saying about
Medicaid and Ryan White for a
longtime is, ‘we really need to let more of
our people on Medicaid because that’s
an entitlement program and that gives
them continuity
of care,’ ” Lubinski said,
noting that the appropriations
for the CARE Act were unpredictable from year to
year.
Historically, the Medicaid program has been at-risk since
the 1980’s when an attempt
to cap spending and
shift the program into
block-grants was averted, and a second
attempt to do so was fended off in
1997.
Eligibility for Medicaid and other public
programs was also eroded in
this time-frame by cutting alcohol and
substance abuse
from the list of
qualifying disabilities and the loss of benefits for legal immigrants
during
their first five years in the country.
Lubinski noted that in the mid-1990’s, with the improvement
in treatment options for
people with HIV disease,
the conceptual framework
was laid for the “Early Treatment
for HIV Act” (ETHA), which would expand
Medicaid eligibility to non-disabled persons
with HIV infection. Lubinski
noted that ETHA is still very high on
the agenda. However,
with the states
in fiscal crisis, the immediate concern is fending off losses of benefits
including:
Reductions in the scope
of the SCHIP program, especially in states that had
expanded coverage to
the parents of children in SCHIP.
Loss of “optional“
services such as dental, vision, or hearing benefits.
Eliminating
medically-needy programs.
Reducing eligibility
guidelines.
Lubinski noted there have been some cost-containment
successes, such as Florida’s
AIDS Disease
Management program, which has
helped reduce the cost of HIV care
and more aggressively monitor the quality
of care at the same time, and a temporary
increase from Congress in the
federal matching rate for Medicaid funds.
Finally,
Lubinski noted the
January 2003 White House proposal, which did not make it into
legislative
language.
The proposal would provide $16 billion in additional funding over
the next seven years and offer states new flexibility
over eligibility and
benefits. However,
|the proposal was heavily criticized by advocates because
it could ultimately
result in a
capping or reduction of benefits, of
inequity in eligibility standards within states, and in
states running
out of Medicaid funding in the midst of a fiscal year. Lubinski noted that
there
was great relief in the advocacy
community when the National Governors
Association could not reach consensus on the plan, yet she warned that
threats to
Medicaid remain, and that those gathered in the audience must
continue to work to
preserve and expand
the Medicaid benefit for people with
HIV infection, and to
preserve and expand Ryan White CARE Act services to
ensure that those not covered
|by Medicaid receive needed services.
 |